Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Late PROMPT REVISION

1991. Many plays and novels use contrasting places (for example, two countries, two cities or towns, two houses, or the land and the sea) to represent opposed forces or ideas that are central to the meaning of the work. Choose a novel or play that contrasts two such places. Write an essay explaining how the places differ, what each place represents, and how their contrast contributes to the meaning of the work.
    
     A contrast between two places is significantly evident in F. Scott Fitzgerald's novel, The Great Gatsby. The characters in this novel are settled either in East or West egg which represent two distinct forces. East Egg is established with individuals who are wealthy from the roots, while the West Egg is known as "new money", a place that attracts un-original wealthy people, people who desire to be like the East Egg. Fitzgerald uses two distinct towns to represent opposing wealth, attitude, and status which contribute to the flow of Jay Gatsby's ambition to become wealthy and win his first love, Daisy Buchanan, back.
Fitzgerald represents the East Egg and West Egg as two different classes of social status and wealth. This is shown when despite Gatsby's lie to Daisy about his prosperous family, she gives up waiting for him  and chooses to marry Tom, a wealthy man from East Egg because East Egg has been home to the elites and upper class. As mentioned before, the East Egg is referred as the old money. When Gatsby throws lavishing consistent parties at his mansion in hopes to attract Daisy; people in the East Egg don't make their way to his party. It takes Nick and Jordan to persuade Daisy and Tom to visit the West. It becomes clear that not only does Fitzgerald incorporate status into locations but also the time period. This is also supported when Tom and Daisy are absorbed to the past traditions and aristocratic values of East and refuse to change unlike Gatsby and Nick.
On the other hand, West Egg is consisted with lower/middle class people who made their own fortune and money without being born with it. The people from the West are new to this wealth and they look up to the stable social standings of the East. This sparks Gatsby to work and reinvent himself to get Daisy back; he settles in the West across the bay from Daisy's home. While these two cities symbolize the difference in society, Fitzgerald uses the West to represent the new present, opposing the old money.  In comparison to Daisy and Tom who are fixed in the past, Nick and Gatsby who live in the West are ready to change and reform. They live in present time and work for the future.
Throughout The Great Gatsby, readers are able to see the difference in wealth, status, and attitude between the East and the West Egg. Fitzgerald creates Tension between the two contrasting places  to represent opposing ideas to the plot. In doing so, the story not only gets interesting, but it connects to past American history and literature. The way Fitzgerald portrayed the West in comparison to the East showed the opportunities provided in both places. It's obvious to see that Gatsby followed the American Dream towards the West to seek fortune. The divided setting of the novel contributes to the symbolic meaning and theme of Fitzgerald's story as a whole.

I took into account of Chris, Julia, and Alison's suggestions. Although I dislike the new structure of the essay, I tried to separate the East and West into two separate paragraphs for less confusion as asked by Alison and Julia. I agreed that missing a thesis creates an unclear point throughout the writing as a whole. I inserted a old-fashioned three point thesis for clarity. I still like my first draft better; maybe it's easier to comprehend for me because I wrote it myself ... 

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Response to Course Material #6

     First blog post as a second semester senior! I recently looked through all my blog posts and it's actually very helpful. We've covered so many things, and if it wasn't for the blogs... It's impossible for me to remember all of them because we barely take notes in class. Anyhow, it's second semester, and we've started a new play, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead and continued with more practice on MC questions.
     When reading Hamlet, I just saw Rosencrantz and Guildenstern as a pair of betrayers; nothing more, nothing less. However, after reading through almost half of this new play, it's really childish, but I see them as the pair of two bad guys in Disney movies or cartoons. You know, one really lanky man and one short clumsy chubby guy who tries to do as they are told from a person of high authority, but ends up screwing everything up because they just don't have common sense. I understand that this play is absurdist with repetitions and no one having a clue what they're saying, but at the same time consists of a deeper meaning behind. However, this one is extra hard to grasp. It could be because we haven't finished reading it. Something I do like about this play would be the witty and sarcastic remarks between the characters. It's really funny and their double meanings are a bit more obvious than in Hamlet. I guess i'll have to read to the end to actually analyze the real Rosencrantz and Guildenstern.
     Multiple choice practices make me feel comfortable while answering, but completely throws me off with the number of questions I incorrectly answered. I sometimes feel that if I studied and used more challenging vocabulary, it would become easier... but that's only to a limit. I find myself easily grasping the meaning "around" the concept, but definitely not to the core. The advice I found to be most helpful was to think in the point of view of the person who wrote the questions and answers. That kind of helps me throw out the illogical answers. That doesn't work all the time though, so I'm trying to look for other ways. Overall, the play and MC questions are a good way to challenge myself and test my abilities.